Archaeomagnetic dating example
Indeed, nothing in science is ever "proven" beyond all possible doubt; there is no way of knowing, with 100% certainty, that one's proof is foolproof.
) If there is one thread running through the scientific world, it is an emphasis on the total picture.If that hypothesis has no credible competition, despite much work in the area, then our confidence in it begins to soar.If that hypothesis also supplies us with numerous insights into nature, which are confirmed by further observation and testing, then it might attain the status of a "scientific theory." (Note that a scientific theory ranks very high in credibility, has been tested repeatedly, and serves as a successful framework for integrating and explaining a class of diverse, natural phenomena; it must not be confused with the layman's use of "theory" which refers to half-baked speculation or guesswork.The new data confine the curve and its error band considerably in the time interval 800 to 1100 AD.
This calibration process also provides probability density distributions for each included structure, which allows for posterior dating and refines temporal errors considerably.There are three principal sampling techniques used in the UK, based on the methods described by Clark et al.